Reconstruction conjecture
Status partial high confidence
The Reconstruction Conjecture remains open for general graphs. Since the problem was posted in 2007, notable partial progress includes: computational verification for all graphs up to 13 vertices (McKay 2021), improved reconstruction-from-smaller-decks results for trees (Groenland–Johnston–Scott–Tan 2021), and a proof that every interval graph on at least 3 vertices is reconstructible (Heinrich–Kiyomi–Otachi–Schweitzer 2025). No counterexample or general proof has been established.
Cited literature (4)
-
Computationally verifies the graph reconstruction conjecture for all graphs up to 13 vertices (and tournaments up to 13, digraphs up to 9), extending the previously established verification bound.
-
Shows trees can be reconstructed from their $(n-r)$-deck for $r \le n/9 + o(n)$, and proves connectivity and degree-sequence can be recovered from much smaller partial decks.
-
Proves that every interval graph on at least 3 vertices is reconstructible (and reconstructible in polynomial time), resolving a longstanding open case via new structural techniques for graph separations.
-
Surveys the reconstruction conjecture and develops an invariant-theoretic algebraic reformulation, aiming to show that polynomials distinguishing decks also distinguish the original graphs.
Reviewer notes. A 2023 paper in Information Sciences (ScienceDirect pii/S0020025523014433) titled 'Vertex-substitution framework verifies the reconstruction conjecture for finite undirected graphs' claims a general proof, but could not be accessed (HTTP 403) and Wikipedia does not list it as a resolution — likely a flawed or unaccepted claimed proof. The arXiv:2501.19081 paper (Kim–Lee 2025) concerns matching polynomial reconstruction for hypergraphs and is not directly about the graph reconstruction conjecture. McKay's paper was submitted in 2021 with a final arXiv revision in January 2022; journal venue not confirmed from available pages. Groenland et al. 2103.13359 was last revised November 2023, possibly in press.
Discussion
See Wikipedia's Reconstruction Conjecture for more on this problem.
Bibliography
-
★
[K]P. J. Kelly, A congruence theorem for trees, Pacific J. Math., 7 (1957), 961–968. -
★
[U]S. M. Ulam, A collection of mathematical problems, Wiley, New York, 1960.