Partitionning a tournament into k-strongly connected subtournaments.

Status solved high confidence

Kühn, Osthus, and Townsend (2016) proved that $f_t(k,\ldots,k) = O(k^7 t^4)$ exists, giving an affirmative answer to Thomassen's partition question for the uniform case; the general non-uniform case (different $k_i$) follows trivially by setting $k = \max_i k_i$. Girão and Letzter (2025) subsequently confirmed the optimal linear bound $f_t(k,\ldots,k) = O(kt)$, matching the lower bound up to a constant.

Cited literature (2)

Reviewer notes. The Kühn-Osthus-Townsend paper (arXiv:1309.7677, submitted 2013-09-29, published Combinatorica ~2016) formally treats the uniform case (all $k_i = k$). The non-uniform Thomassen problem reduces to the uniform case via $k = \max_i k_i$, so $g(k_1,\ldots,k_p) \leq f_p(\max_i k_i, \ldots, \max_i k_i)$. The Springer pages for both Combinatorica articles were authentication-blocked; publication years and DOIs are inferred from arXiv metadata (last revision June 2025 for Girão-Letzter) and DOI string patterns. The Girão-Letzter paper (arXiv:2210.17371) was confirmed published in Combinatorica with DOI 10.1007/s00493-025-00161-3.

Auto-reviewed 2026-05-08 with claude-sonnet-4-6 (worker 05) (web search enabled).

Problem. Let $ k_1, \dots , k_p $ be positve integer Does there exists an integer $ g(k_1, \dots , k_p) $ such that every $ g(k_1, \dots , k_p) $ -strong tournament $ T $ admits a partition $ (V_1\dots , V_p) $ of its vertex set such that the subtournament induced by $ V_i $ is a non-trivial $ k_i $ -strong for all $ 1\leq i\leq p $ .

Discussion

If $ k_i=1 $ for $ 2\leq k_i\leq k_p $ , then $ g(k_1, \dots , k_p) $ exists and is at most $ k_1+3p-3 $ . This follows by an easy induction on $ p $ , by taking $ V_p $ to be a set inducing a directed $ 3 $ -cycle. The following example shows that if it exists $ g(k_1, \dots , k_p)\geq k_1+\cdots + k_p $ . Set $ s=k_1 + \cdots + k_p -1 $ . For $ n\geq 3s $ , let $ R_s(n) $ be a tournament on $ n $ vertices having a set $ R $ of $ s $ vertices such that $ T-R $ a transitive tournament of order $ n-s $ with hamiltonian path $ (v_1,\dots , v_{n-s}) $ , and $ R $ dominates $ \{v_1, \dots , v_{s}\} $ and is dominated by $ \{v_{n-2s+1}, \dots , v_{n-s}\} $ . It easy to check that $ R_s(n) $ is $ s $ -strongly connected. However, every (non-trivial) $ k $ -strong tournament of $ R_s(n) $ must contain at least $ k $ vertices of $ R $ . Hence $ R_s(n) $ does not have a partition $ (V_1\dots , V_p) $ of its vertex set such that the subtournament induced by $ V_i $ is a non-trivial $ k_i $ -strong for all $ 1\leq i\leq p $ . Some small examples give better lower bound. For example, the Paley tournament on 7 vertices which is 3-strong cannot be partionned into two strong subtournaments. However, there are only finitely many known such tournaments. Chen, Gould, and Li [CGL] showed that every $ k $ -strongly connected tournament with at least $ 8k $ vertices has a partition into $ k $ strongly connected tournaments. The existence of $ g(2,2) $ is still open.

Bibliography

  • [CGL] G. Chen, R.J. Gould, and H. Li, Partitioning vertices of a tournament into independent cycles , J. combin. Theory Ser B, Vol 83, no. 2 (2001) 213-220. Partitioning vertices of a tournament into independent cycles
  • [R] K.B. Reid, Three problems on tournaments, Graph Theory and Its Applications, East. and West. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 576 (1989), 466-473.