Hamiltonian cycles in line graphs of infinite graphs
Status partial medium confidence
The conjecture has seen partial progress on Part 1: Florian Lehner proved (arXiv:1109.6787, JCTB 2014) that the line graph of every locally finite, highly edge-connected graph (≥6-edge-connected, in the sense of the end-faithful spanning tree packing result) has a Hamiltonian circle, extending the classical finite result; this is a weakening of the 4-edge-connected threshold asked in the conjecture. Part 2 (4-connected line graph implies Hamiltonian) remains widely open even for finite graphs, and Part 1 in its full 4-edge-connected form is still open.
Cited literature (2)
-
Extends the Tutte/Nash-Williams tree-packing theorem to end-faithful packings in certain locally finite graphs, establishing that the line graph of every locally finite, sufficiently highly edge-connected graph has a Hamiltonian circle (a partial result toward the 4-edge-connected conjecture).
-
Proves that every connected, locally connected, locally finite, claw-free graph has a Hamilton circle; since line graphs are claw-free, this has implications for Hamiltonicity of line graphs of locally finite graphs with sufficient edge-connectivity.
Reviewer notes. PDFs at florian-lehner.net and math.uni-hamburg.de were not text-readable via WebFetch, so exact theorem statements could not be directly verified. The claim that the Lehner 2014 paper covers the '6-edge-connected' case is consistently reported in secondary sources (including Mohar's problem page and search result abstracts) but could not be confirmed by reading the theorem directly. The Hamann-Lehner-Pott 2016 paper's abstract emphasizes claw-free locally connected graphs rather than mentioning line graphs explicitly; a corollary for line graphs may follow but was not directly verified. Both conjectures (4-edge-connected and 4-connected line graph) appear to remain open as of the search date.
Discussion
(Reproduced from [M].) A locally finite graph is hamiltonian, if its Freudenthal compactification (also called the end compactification, see [D]) contains a hamilton circle, i.e. a homeomorphic copy of $ S^1 $ containing all vertices. The first part is known for finite graphs. The proof uses the existence of two edge-disjoint spanning trees in 4-edge-connected graphs. In the infinite case, it would be enough to prove that a 4-edge-connected locally finite graph $ G $ has two edge-disjoint topological spanning trees (see [D]), one of which is connected as a subgraph of $ G $ . The problem is open even for the 1-ended case (where hamilton circles correspond to 2-way-infinite paths). The second part is widely open even in the finite case, where it was proposed by Thomassen [T].
Bibliography
-
[D]Reinhard Diestel, Graph Theory, Third Edition, Springer, 2005. -
★
[G]A. Georgakopoulos, Oberwolfach reports, 2007. -
[M]Bojan Mohar, Problem of the Month Problem of the Month -
[T]Carsten Thomassen, Reflections on graph theory, J. Graph Theory 10 (1986) 309-324, MathSciNet MathSciNet