Crossing numbers and coloring
Status partial high confidence
Albertson's conjecture remains open in general, but substantial progress has been made since it was posted in 2009. Ackerman (2019) extended the verified range from $t \le 16$ to $t \le 18$; Cranston (2025) further pushed this to $t \le 24$ and greatly restricts possible counterexamples for $t \in \{25, 26\}$; Fox, Pach, and Suk (SoCG 2025) proved the conjecture for all graphs with chromatic number $k$ having at most $1.4(k-1)$ vertices (for sufficiently large $k$), via the Lescure–Meyniel weak immersion conjecture.
Cited literature (3)
-
As a corollary of results on topological graphs with at most four crossings per edge, proves Albertson's conjecture for $r \le 18$, extending the prior bound of $r \le 16$.
-
Proves Albertson's conjecture for all graphs with chromatic number $k$ having at most $1.4(k-1)$ vertices (for sufficiently large $k$), via a proof of the Lescure–Meyniel weak immersion conjecture in that range.
-
Extends verification of Albertson's conjecture to $r \le 24$ (from $r \le 18$) and greatly restricts the possible counterexamples for $r \in \{25, 26\}$, also improving bounds on the order of a minimum counterexample.
Reviewer notes. The Ackerman paper (arXiv:1509.01932) was submitted in 2015 and revised/published in 2019; Wikipedia identifies the venue as Computational Geometry but I did not independently verify the journal DOI. The Fox–Pach–Suk arXiv preprint (2510.05893) appeared October 2025 after the SoCG 2025 conference; the published DROPS version cites the 1.4(k-1) vertex bound. The Cranston 2025 paper (arXiv:2512.08020) is a preprint as of December 2025; journal publication status unknown. The conjecture remains wide open for general graphs.
Discussion
This conjecture is an interesting weakening of the disproved Hajos Conjecture which asserted that $ \chi(G) \ge t $ implies that $ G $ contains a subdivision of $ K_t $ . A minimal counterexample to Albertson's conjecture is critical, with minimum degree $ \ge t $ . Using this and the crossing lemma, Albertson, Cranston and Fox showed that a minimum counterexample has at most $ 4t $ vertices. They then analyzed small cases to show that the conjecture holds for $ t \le 12 $ . More recently, Barat and Toth [BT] sharpened these arguments to show that the conjecture holds for $ t \le 16 $ .
Bibliography
-
[BT]J. Barat and G. Toth, Towards the Albertson Conjecture Towards the Albertson Conjecture