Polynomial tree-α bound in K_{t,t}-free graphs
Question 5.2 · arXiv:2511.03864
Status open high confidence
Question 5.2 is left open in the source paper arXiv:2511.03864. The paper's main result (Theorem 1.2) establishes tree-α(G) = O_t(μ^{3t²+1}) for K_{t,t}-free graphs with tree-μ(G) ≤ μ, giving a polynomial bound in μ for fixed t; however, Question 5.2 asks for the reverse direction: a polynomial bound in t for fixed μ. Lemma 5.1 of the paper shows the existing bound involves N(s,s,2) which is exponential in s, motivating the question, but does not rule out a polynomial in t for fixed μ. No follow-up paper resolving this question was found in the indexed literature in the six months since posting.
Reviewer notes. The paper was posted November 2025 and Question 5.2 is explicitly left open. The main theorem gives tree-α(G) = O_t(μ^{3t²+1}), a polynomial in μ (for fixed t) but with t-dependent exponent, so it does not answer Question 5.2. No follow-up resolving this specific question was found after 5 web calls; the conjecture is open with high confidence given its recency.
Context
Lemma 5.1 shows that the smallest integer $\mathsf{N}(s,s,2)$ appearing in the bound from Abrishami et al. is not bounded by any polynomial in both parameters, motivating the question of whether a polynomial bound in $t$ alone (for fixed $\mu$) is achievable. The question asks specifically whether tree-independence number can be bounded polynomially in the induced biclique exclusion parameter $t$ for graphs of bounded induced matching treewidth.
Also stated in
Source paper
Induced matching treewidth and tree-independence number, revisited
Noga Alon, Martin Milanič, Paweł Rzążewski · 2025-11-05
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03864