High chromatic number forcing high degeneracy out-neighbourhood
Question 10 · arXiv:2305.15585
Status open high confidence
Question 10 of arXiv:2305.15585 asks whether high chromatic number forces some out-neighbourhood to have high degeneracy; the authors explicitly state they have been unable to determine this. The paper establishes a positive analogue for the degeneracy-to-degeneracy setting (Theorem 6: high degeneracy forces a two-vertex out-neighbourhood with high degeneracy), but the chromatic-number version for a single vertex remains open. No follow-up paper resolving the question was found in a search covering literature through May 2026.
Reviewer notes. No follow-up found after a 5-call web search. The paper (published in JCTB 2024) itself poses Question 10 as genuinely open, distinguishing it from the degeneracy-to-degeneracy case which the authors resolve positively. The Barbados 2025 open-problems PDF was inaccessible (binary/compressed), and the related survey arXiv:2306.02364 focuses on tournament colouring structure rather than this specific question.
Context
In the closing remarks the authors note they have been unable to determine whether high chromatic number forces an out-neighbourhood with high degeneracy. The paper's disproof of Conjecture 1 shows chromatic number is not preserved, but degeneracy is a weaker measure and may behave differently.
Source paper
Chromatic number is not tournament-local
António Girão, Kevin Hendrey, Freddie Illingworth, Florian Lehner, Lukas Michel, Michael Savery, Raphael Steiner · 2023-12-04
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15585