Chordal modulator characterization for even-hole-free graphs

Informal Conjecture (chordal modulator characterization for even-hole-free graphs) · arXiv:2301.02138

arXiv Informal medium confidence— first stated 2023-01-28

Status partial high confidence

The conjecture that every chordal graph of clique number at most three modulates even-hole-free graphs (the converse of Theorem 1.2 of Sintiari–Trotignon) remains open in full generality. The source paper itself proved the case when H is a forest (Theorem 1.6). Subsequently, Hajebi (2024/2025) proved the conjecture for H = cone(cone(F)) for any forest F and for H a 'crystal' (a graph built from coned double stars), substantially extending the known special cases, but the full statement for all K₄-free chordal H is still open.

Cited literature (1)

Reviewer notes. The conjecture from 2301.02138 is equivalent to the main Conjecture 1.8 of arXiv:2401.01299 (bounded-treewidth characterization for even-hole-free graphs): 'K₄-free chordal graphs' equals 'chordal graphs of clique number at most three'. arXiv:2401.01299 proves new cases (Theorems 1.11 and 1.12) but the full conjecture remains open. A strengthening (Conjecture 1.14 in 2401.01299) was disproved by Chudnovsky and Trotignon via a new variant of layered wheels, but this does not affect the main conjecture.

Auto-reviewed 2026-05-15 with claude-sonnet-4-6 (web search enabled).

Informal. Every chordal graph of clique number at most three modulates even-hole-free graphs.

Context

Theorem 1.2 (Sintiari–Trotignon) shows that a graph $H$ can modulate even-hole-free graphs only if $H$ is a chordal graph of clique number at most three; the authors state that the converse may also be true. The paper proves the forest case (Theorem 1.6) but explicitly notes that extending to all chordal graphs of clique number at most three remains open.

Notes. Stated as "as far as we know, the converse may also be true" in the introduction; confirmed open by the subsequent remark "while the former remains open".

Source paper

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions VIII. Excluding a forest in (theta, prism)-free graphs
Tara Abrishami, Bogdan Alecu, Maria Chudnovsky, Sepehr Hajebi, Sophie Spirkl · 2023-01-28
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02138 PDF source