Existence of limit n(2,d)/d²
Open question on existence of lim n(2,d)/d^2 · arXiv:2212.05133
Status open medium confidence
The question of whether $\lim_{d\to\infty} n(2,d)/d^2$ exists remains open. The source paper establishes the lower bound $n(2,d) > (1-o(1))d^2/2$ and conjectures the limit equals $1/2$ if it exists. A 2024 follow-up (arXiv:2402.02199) gives new lower bounds via a recursive construction of 2-neighborly codes and proposes a conjectured explicit formula for $n(2,d)$, but explicitly acknowledges that the existence of the limit is still unknown. No paper resolving the existence question was found.
Cited literature (1)
-
Provides improved lower bounds on $n(2,d)$ via a recursive construction of k-neighborly codes and conjectures an explicit formula for $n(2,d)$, while explicitly noting that the existence of $\lim_{d\to\infty} n(2,d)/d^2$ remains unknown.
Reviewer notes. A 2024 follow-up (arXiv:2402.02199) explicitly restates the open question, confirming the limit question was unresolved as of February 2024. Authors of arXiv:2402.02199 were not retrieved from the abstract fetch (PDF was not machine-readable). Confidence is medium rather than high because the conjecture is now ~3 years old and further progress since 2024 could not be ruled out within the 5-call cap.
Context
The authors conjecture that if the limit exists it equals $\frac{1}{2}$, but explicitly remark that even the existence of the limit is currently unknown. The paper provides the lower bound $n(2,d) > (1-o(1))\frac{d^2}{2}$ via Theorem 2.
Notes. Explicitly stated in the introduction: 'as yet we do not even know whether the limit above exists'. PDF source — math notation may be garbled.
Source paper
New bounds on the maximum number of neighborly boxes in R^d
Noga Alon, Jarosław Grytczuk, Andrzej P. Kisielewicz, Krzysztof Przesławski · 2023-03-03
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05133
PDF source