Characterisation of poly-χ-bounded hereditary classes
Question (which hereditary classes are poly-χ-bounded?) · arXiv:2202.09118
Status open high confidence
The overarching question of characterising which hereditary classes are polynomially χ-bounded remains open. After Briański, Davies and Walczak disproved Esperet's conjecture (that every χ-bounded hereditary class is poly-χ-bounded), the Pollyanna framework was introduced to organise which hereditary classes do satisfy a polynomial binding function, with specific forbidden-subgraph families now confirmed to be poly-χ-bounded. No complete characterisation is known as of 2026.
Cited literature (2)
-
Proves polynomial χ-boundedness for {H1, H2}-free graphs when every component of H1 is a good forest and H2 is a broom or P4, extending the catalogue of poly-χ-bounded hereditary classes.
-
Proves three new strong Pollyanna results, including that for each t ≥ 2 the class of {diamond, hammer(t)⁺}-free graphs is t-strongly Pollyanna, advancing the programme of identifying which hereditary classes are poly-χ-bounded.
Reviewer notes. Esperet's conjecture (every χ-bounded hereditary class is poly-χ-bounded) was disproved by Briański, Davies and Walczak (arXiv:2201.08814, published Combinatorica 2024); this is the direct motivation for the question as stated in the source paper. The Pollyanna framework — asking which hereditary classes C have the property that C ∩ F is poly-χ-bounded for every χ-bounded F — has been developed as a structured approach to the overarching question. A related but distinct direction (arXiv:2512.09176, Rahimi and Mojdeh 2025) studies an analogue using the domination parameter τ_d(G) rather than ω(G). Internal reference arXiv:2311.05719 appears to be a treewidth paper mismatched to this conjecture identifier.
Context
Esperet's conjecture that every $\chi$-bounded hereditary class is poly-$\chi$-bounded was recently disproved by Briański, Davies and Walczak. This motivates the overarching question of characterising which hereditary classes do have a polynomial binding function.
Notes. Posed as a guiding open question in the introduction after noting Esperet's conjecture was disproved; no formal label.
Source paper
Polynomial bounds for chromatic number VII. Disjoint holes
Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, Sophie Spirkl · 2022-02-18
https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09118
PDF source