Polynomial χ-boundedness for forest-free graphs
Conjecture 1.3 · arXiv:2202.05557
Status partial high confidence
Conjecture 1.3 — polynomial chi-boundedness for every forest-free graph class — remains open in full generality as of May 2026. Significant partial progress has been made: Nguyen (arXiv:2512.24907, 2025) proved the conjecture for H = P_5, the five-vertex path, resolving a case open since 1985; Davies and Yuditsky (arXiv:2407.16882, 2024) proved it for all forests H when the host graphs have bounded boxicity. The ongoing Scott–Seymour series establishes polynomial bounds for several additional tree families, but no uniform proof for all forests exists.
Cited literature (2)
-
Proves that every P₅-free graph G satisfies χ(G) ≤ f(ω(G)) for a polynomial f, establishing Conjecture 1.3 for the specific forest H = P₅ (the five-vertex path).
-
Proves Conjecture 1.3 for every forest H when restricted to intersection graphs of axis-aligned boxes in ℝ^d (graphs of bounded boxicity).
Reviewer notes. Conjecture 1.3 is closely related to Esperet's conjecture (polynomial chi-boundedness for hereditary classes, now disproved in general) and to the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture (which concerns bounded chromatic number, not polynomial bounds). The P5 case (arXiv:2512.24907) and the bounded-boxicity case (arXiv:2407.16882) are the most notable post-2023 advances. Internal reference 2508.14332 appears unrelated.
Context
This conjecture is presented as what the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture (1.1) and Esperet's conjecture (that every $\chi$-bounded hereditary class has a polynomial bounding function) would jointly imply for forest-free graph classes. Esperet's conjecture has been disproved in full generality but remains open for classes excluding a forest, and Conjecture 1.3 is known only for a few special families of trees.
Notes. Stated in the paper without a parenthesised attribution; it is a natural combination of Conjecture 1.1 and Esperet's conjecture restricted to forest-free classes.
Source paper
Polynomial bounds for chromatic number. V. Excluding a tree of radius two and a complete multipartite graph
Alex Scott, Paul Seymour · 2023-01-10
https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05557
PDF source