Bounded twin-width for polynomial expansion classes
Question: polynomial expansion and twin-width · arXiv:2006.09877
Status open high confidence
The question of whether classes with polynomial expansion have bounded twin-width remains open as of 2026, confirmed by Bonnet's own open-problems page which lists it with the note 'we are quite far from proving it.' Twin-width IV (arXiv:2102.03117) gives a partial resolution for hereditary classes of ordered graphs, showing bounded twin-width and sub-exponential growth are equivalent in that setting. The related but strictly more general 'small conjecture' (every small class has bounded twin-width) was disproved by Twin-width VII (arXiv:2204.12330), which constructs via a Cayley-graph argument a small class with unbounded twin-width; however, that counterexample does not have polynomial expansion, so the polynomial-expansion question remains open and isolated.
Cited literature (2)
-
Proves that for hereditary classes of ordered graphs, bounded twin-width is equivalent to sub-exponential (2^{O(n)}) growth, giving a partial resolution of the conjecture in the ordered setting.
-
Disproves the more general 'small conjecture' by constructing (via a finitely generated group with infinite twin-width, Theorem 1.1) a small hereditary class with unbounded twin-width (Corollary 1.4); the counterexample is not a class with polynomial expansion, so the polynomial-expansion question itself remains open.
Reviewer notes. Bonnet's open-problems page (fetched 2026-05-15) explicitly lists this question as open with the remark 'we are quite far from proving it.' The small conjecture (small ⇒ bounded twin-width) was disproved by Twin-width VII; the polynomial expansion question is a strictly harder sub-question that survives the disproof because the Cayley-graph counterexample lacks polynomial expansion.
Context
Towards the small conjecture, the authors identify showing that small sparse classes have bounded (sparse) twin-width as a first, challenging step. Since classes with polynomial expansion are small, confirming bounded twin-width for them would constitute meaningful progress.
Notes. Stated as an explicit open question in the introduction without a labelled environment. PDF extraction is truncated; additional numbered questions may appear in later sections.
Source paper
Twin-width II: small classes
Édouard Bonnet, Colin Geniet, Eun Jung Kim, Stéphan Thomassé, Rémi Watrigant · 2020-06-17
https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.09877
PDF source