Exponent gap for frozen (Δ+1)-colourings
Informal: Exponent in Theorem 1 not optimal · arXiv:1811.12650
Status open high confidence
Theorem 1 of arXiv:1811.12650 gives the upper bound $(6/7)^{n/(\Delta+1)}$ on the probability that a uniform random $(\Delta+1)$-colouring is frozen, while Proposition 4 provides a matching lower bound with exponent $e^{-3\log(\Delta)/\Delta \cdot n}$, leaving a gap of a $\log\Delta$ factor in the exponent. The authors believe the upper bound can be tightened to close this gap. No follow-up paper improving or resolving this exponent gap was found in any indexed literature searched.
Reviewer notes. No follow-up found improving the log(Delta) gap in the exponent. The conjecture states informally that the dependence on Delta in the exponent of (6/7)^{n/(Delta+1)} is not best possible; the matching lower bound has exponent e^{-3 log(Delta)/Delta * n}, so the gap is a factor of log(Delta). Semantic Scholar API returned zero citations, and targeted web searches found no subsequent paper closing or narrowing this gap.
Context
Theorem 1 gives the upper bound $(6/7)^{n/(\Delta+1)}$ on the probability a uniform random $(\Delta+1)$-colouring is frozen. Proposition 4 provides a matching lower bound with exponent $e^{-3\log(\Delta)/\Delta \cdot n}$, leaving a gap of a $\log\Delta$ factor. The authors believe the upper bound can be tightened to close this gap.
Notes. Stated in running prose: 'We believe that the dependence on Δ in the exponent in Theorem 1 is not best possible.' PDF source — verify exponent expressions.
Source paper
Frozen $(Δ+1)$-colourings of bounded degree graphs
Marthe Bonamy, Nicolas Bousquet, Guillem Perarnau · 2018-11-30
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12650
PDF source