Polynomial domination bound in triangle-free digraphs

Conjecture 3.5 · arXiv:1708.00423

arXiv Conjecture high confidence— first stated 2018-04-27

Status open low confidence

Conjecture 3.5 of arXiv:1708.00423 asserts that there is an integer \ell such that every directed-triangle-free digraph satisfies \gamma(G) \le \alpha^{\ell}. The paper itself proves only the weaker factorial bound \gamma(G) \le \alpha(G)\cdot\alpha(G)!, and presents the conjecture as a necessary consequence of the authors' earlier dichromatic-number conjecture (polynomial bound on \vec{\chi} in terms of \alpha). No follow-up paper resolving Conjecture 3.5 was found in the literature across searches targeting the source arXiv ID, key mathematical terms, and the authors.

Reviewer notes. No follow-up resolving Conjecture 3.5 was found. The conjecture is from 2018 (~8 years old), so the absence of a follow-up is mildly suspicious and warrants low confidence. Related work found: arXiv:2602.08736 constructs (claw, directed-C3)-free digraphs with unbounded dichromatic number, disproving a conjecture of Aboulker–Charbit–Naserasr, but that result concerns a different (stronger) formulation and does not directly settle Conjecture 3.5. The parent dichromatic-number conjecture by the same authors remains the key open problem; Conjecture 3.5 would follow if it is ever proved.

Auto-reviewed 2026-05-15 with claude-sonnet-4-6 (web search enabled).

Conjecture. There is an integer $\ell$ such that if $G$ is a directed-triangle-free digraph with $\alpha(D) = \alpha$, then $\gamma(G) \leq \alpha^{\ell}$.

Context

The same authors previously conjectured in [8] that the dichromatic number $\vec{\chi}(G)$ of a directed-triangle-free digraph can be bounded as a polynomial function of $\alpha(G)$. Because $\gamma(G) \leq \alpha(G) \cdot \vec{\chi}(G)$ (Observation 3.4), Conjecture 3.5 is presented as a necessary consequence: if the dichromatic-number conjecture holds, so must this domination bound.

Also stated in

Notes. The hypothesis uses $\alpha(D) = \alpha$ in the PDF source, but the digraph is consistently called $G$ throughout the paper; this appears to be a typo for $\alpha(G) = \alpha$.

Source paper

Domination and fractional domination in digraphs
Ararat Harutyunyan, Tien-Nam Le, Alantha Newman, Stéphan Thomassé · 2018-04-27
https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00423 PDF source