Pervasiveness of forests of lanterns
Conjecture: every forest of lanterns is pervasive · arXiv:1609.00314
Status open high confidence
The conjecture that every forest of lanterns is pervasive in the class of all graphs remains open. The source paper itself establishes the result for all ρ-controlled ideals (ρ ≥ 2) and for the class of string graphs (which is 2-controlled), but the question for the ideal of all graphs is explicitly noted as open in the abstract. A wide web search through 2026 found no subsequent paper resolving the full conjecture.
Reviewer notes. All five supplied internal references are false positives — none address the forest-of-lanterns pervasiveness conjecture. The conjecture is explicitly open in the source paper for the class of all graphs; the paper's own positive results (ρ-controlled ideals, string graphs) are the deepest known partial results. No follow-up resolving the full conjecture was found in the indexed literature through May 2026.
Context
Results of Chalopin, Esperet, Li and Ossona de Mendez (via the Burling/Pawlik graphs) show that every pervasive graph must be a forest of lanterns. The authors state 'perhaps the converse is true, that every forest of lanterns is pervasive', and the abstract notes 'it is not known whether every forest of lanterns is pervasive in the class of all graphs.' The paper proves pervasiveness of all forests of lanterns in every $\rho$-controlled ideal ($\rho \geq 2$) and in the class of string graphs, but the question for the ideal of all graphs remains open.
Notes. Stated as 'perhaps the converse is true' in the introduction and as an explicitly open problem in the abstract; no formal conjecture environment.
Source paper
Induced subgraphs of graphs with large chromatic number. V. Chandeliers and strings
Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour · 2021-05-21
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00314
PDF source