Majority 3-coloring of Eulerian digraphs
Open Problem 3 · arXiv:1608.03040
Status open high confidence
Open Problem 3 — whether every Eulerian digraph has a majority 3-colouring — remains unresolved as of May 2026. The source paper already establishes that Eulerian digraphs admit a 3-colouring in which each vertex v has at most (2/3)deg(v) same-colour in-or-out-neighbours, but the stricter majority bound of (1/2)deg^+(v) same-colour out-neighbours is still open. Anastos, Lamaison, Steiner and Szabó (2019, arXiv:1911.01954) made substantial progress on the broader Open Problem 1 (majority 3-coloring for all digraphs), proving partial cases for sparse digraphs, but their results do not directly resolve the Eulerian case. No subsequent paper found in the literature settles Open Problem 3.
Cited literature (1)
-
Proves the broader majority 3-coloring conjecture (Open Problem 1) for digraphs with chromatic number at most 6 or dichromatic number at most 3, and proves majority 3-choosability for digraphs with max out-degree at most 4 or max degree at most 7; does not specifically address Eulerian digraphs (Open Problem 3).
Reviewer notes. All six internal-reference entries reduce to a single paper (arXiv:1911.01954). Open Problem 3 is strictly about Eulerian digraphs and is a weaker conjecture than Open Problem 1; no paper found that exploits the Eulerian structure to achieve a full majority 3-colouring. The conjecture is open with high confidence.
Context
For Eulerian digraphs $G$ where every vertex $v$ has equal in- and out-degree $\deg(v)$, Lovász's result for undirected graphs gives a majority 4-colouring, and an analogous argument yields a 3-colouring in which each vertex $v$ has at most $\frac{2}{3}\deg(v)$ same-colour in-or-out-neighbours, proving a special case of Open Problem 1. Whether a full majority 3-colouring (with $\frac{1}{2}\deg^+(v)$) exists for all Eulerian digraphs is open.
Also stated in
- Majority Colourings of Digraphs (2016-08-10)
Source paper
Majority Colourings of Digraphs
Stephan Kreutzer, Sang-il Oum, Paul Seymour, Dominic van der Zypen, David R. Wood · 2016-08-10
https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03040
PDF source