Majority 3-coloring of tournaments
Open Problem 2 · arXiv:1608.03040
Status open high confidence
The question of whether every tournament admits a majority 3-colouring remains open as of May 2026. Anastos, Lamaison, Steiner, and Szabó (2019) proved the broader majority 3-coloring conjecture for digraphs with chromatic number at most 6 or dichromatic number at most 3, and majority 3-choosability for digraphs with maximum out-degree at most 4 or maximum degree at most 7, covering some but not all tournaments. Multiple recent surveys confirm the general majority 3-coloring conjecture for digraphs is 'far from being resolved', and no complete resolution for tournaments has been found.
Cited literature (1)
-
Proves the majority 3-coloring conjecture for digraphs with chromatic number at most 6 or dichromatic number at most 3 (covering some tournaments) and majority 3-choosability for digraphs with maximum out-degree at most 4 or maximum degree at most 7; the general tournament case remains open.
Reviewer notes. All five internal reference records de-duplicate to arXiv:1911.01954. The fuzz=98 record's attribution of 'answering the question negatively' is misleading for this specific open problem: Theorem 9 of that paper establishes NP-completeness of deciding majority 2-colorability for general digraphs, which is unrelated to Open Problem 2 (3-colorability of tournaments). Web search results from 2025 confirm the general majority 3-coloring conjecture is described as far from resolved. No paper specifically resolving the tournament case was found.
Context
Ilya Bogdanov proved (in response to the original MathOverflow question [7]) that tournaments admit a majority colouring with a bounded number of colours, but whether 3 colours suffice for all tournaments is open.
Source paper
Majority Colourings of Digraphs
Stephan Kreutzer, Sang-il Oum, Paul Seymour, Dominic van der Zypen, David R. Wood · 2016-08-10
https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03040
PDF source