Majority 1/k out-neighbour colouring digraphs
Conjecture 9 · arXiv:1608.03040
Status disproved medium confidence
Conjecture 9 from arXiv:1608.03040 asserts that for k≥2, every digraph can be (k+1)-coloured so that each vertex shares its colour with at most 1/k of its out-neighbours (i.e. the generalised majority chromatic number m(k) equals k+1). Girão, Kittipassorn, and Popielarz (arXiv:1701.03780, CPC 2017) proved that m(k) ∈ {2k−1, 2k}, establishing in particular a lower bound m(k) ≥ 2k−1; for k≥3 this exceeds k+1, disproving the conjecture for those values of k. The special case k=2 (the majority 3-colouring conjecture) remains open; Anastos, Lamaison, Steiner, and Szabó (arXiv:1911.01954, 2019) proved it for digraphs with chromatic number at most 6 or dichromatic number at most 3, and established NP-completeness of majority 2-colourability.
Cited literature (2)
-
Proves m(k) ∈ {2k−1, 2k}, where m(k) is the minimum number of colours guaranteeing each vertex shares its colour with at most 1/k of its out-neighbours; the lower bound m(k) ≥ 2k−1 > k+1 for k≥3 disproves Conjecture 9 for all such k.
-
Proves the k=2 case (majority 3-colouring) for digraphs with chromatic number ≤6 or dichromatic number ≤3; shows majority 2-colourability is NP-complete; obtains fractional bound m(2) ≤ 3.9602 via probabilistic methods.
Reviewer notes. Conjecture 9 is disproved for k≥3 by arXiv:1701.03780 (Girão, Kittipassorn, Popielarz, CPC 2017), which establishes m(k)≥2k−1>k+1 for those k. The surviving open case is k=2, i.e. the majority 3-colouring conjecture (Conjecture 2 of the same source paper). Confidence is medium because the full counterexample construction in 1701.03780 was not read directly, only the Cambridge Core abstract and arXiv abstract page.
Context
This is the natural generalisation of Conjecture 2 to arbitrary $k$. The proof of Theorem 1 generalises to give an upper bound of $k^2$ colours; whether $O(k)$ colours suffice is explicitly stated as open. The conjecture is best possible, as shown by the $k$-th power of a directed $n$-cycle with $n \not\equiv 0 \pmod{k+1}$.
Also stated in
- Majority Colourings of Digraphs (2016-08-10)
Notes. PDF source — '$k > 2$' in extracted text likely renders '$k \geq 2$'; LaTeX corrected to $k \geq 2$ for mathematical consistency with the stated generalisation of Conjecture 2.
Source paper
Majority Colourings of Digraphs
Stephan Kreutzer, Sang-il Oum, Paul Seymour, Dominic van der Zypen, David R. Wood · 2016-08-10
https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03040
PDF source