Correspondence chromatic number planar graphs C₄–C₈-free
Informal Conjecture on Correspondence Chromatic Number of Planar Graphs Without Cycles 4–8 · arXiv:1508.03437
Status solved high confidence
Jin, Kang, and Zhu (arXiv:2412.19059, December 2024) proved the stronger Theorem 1.4: every planar graph with no cycle of length 4, 6, or 8 is DP-3-colorable. Since any planar graph without cycles of lengths 4 to 8 is a special case (having no 4-, 6-, or 8-cycles), the conjecture of Dvořák and Postle follows as an immediate corollary. The paper explicitly identifies this as resolving the conjecture from arXiv:1508.03437, describing it as a ‘more natural and stronger claim’ that such graphs are DP-3-colorable without the consistency assumption.
Cited literature (1)
-
Proves that every planar graph with no cycle of length 4, 6, or 8 is DP-3-colorable (Theorem 1.4), which is strictly stronger than the conjecture and implies it as a corollary; the paper explicitly cites the Dvořák–Postle conjecture from 1508.03437.
Reviewer notes. The conjecture is resolved as a corollary of a strictly stronger theorem proved in arXiv:2412.19059. The stronger result only requires excluding cycles of lengths 4, 6, and 8 (not all five lengths 4–8), making it a genuine strengthening rather than merely a proof of the original statement.
Context
Theorem 6 is proved only for 3-correspondence assignments that are consistent on every closed walk of length 3, a restriction needed to carry out the main reduction. The authors remark that they do not know any counterexample to the stronger claim that the full correspondence chromatic number is at most 3.
Source paper
Correspondence coloring and its application to list-coloring planar graphs without cycles of lengths 4 to 8
Zdenek Dvorak, Luke Postle · 2016-10-08
https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.03437
PDF source